200 papers synthesized in a weekend. Cross-study patterns surfaced automatically. Grant proposals with every citation verified. Research at the speed your ideas deserve.
Memory
Your systematic review requires synthesizing 200+ papers. You have been reading 4 per day, which means this alone takes 7 weeks. Drop all 200 PDFs into Kent Drop. Kent extracts every author, methodology, sample size, statistical approach, finding, and limitation into your knowledge graph. Now ask: "Which studies used randomized controlled trials with sample sizes over 500?" Kent returns 34 papers. "Of those, which found statistically significant results for the primary outcome?" 19. "Generate a comparison table of their effect sizes, confidence intervals, and noted limitations." Done. What took a postdoc 7 weeks took you a weekend.
Drop 217 papers on cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Ask Kent: "Group these by methodology and identify any studies that contradict the meta-analysis conclusion from Smith et al. 2023." Kent clusters them into 4 methodology groups, identifies 6 contradicting studies, and notes that 3 of those used non-standard sleep measurement tools, which may explain the discrepancy. Your lit review just gained a critical insight.
Discovery
You have been researching gut microbiome diversity for 3 years across two NIH-funded studies. You never noticed that the outlier participants in Study A share a dietary pattern with the high-responders in Study B because the datasets live in separate workspaces. Connect your lab's PostgreSQL database and Kent can cross-reference the raw participant data alongside your published findings. Kent's background discovery engine cross-references entity patterns across your entire knowledge graph and surfaces: "12 participants flagged as outliers in your Microbiome Diversity study (2023) share the same high-fermented-food dietary pattern as the top quartile responders in your Immune Response study (2024). This correlation has not been explored in your published work." That is a new paper.
Kent notification: "Across your 3 active research projects, the compound resveratrol appears in 23 sources but has never been mentioned in your own writing or notes. 4 papers in your Aging workspace and 3 in your Inflammation workspace cite overlapping mechanisms. This may represent an unexplored connection." You schedule a meeting with your co-PI. That notification becomes an R21 application.
Grants
You are writing an NIH R01 and need to reference findings from across your entire publication history and research archive. Normally this means hunting through folders of papers, re-reading your own methods sections, and manually checking that every claim has a citation. Connect your Google Drive publications folder and Kent ingests your entire body of work into the knowledge graph automatically as you publish. You write a claim, and Kent surfaces the 3 strongest supporting sources from your archive, complete with page numbers and quote context. It flags any claim that lacks source support. Your specific aims page goes from scattered notes to a tight, fully-cited draft in 2 days instead of 2 weeks.
You write: "Previous work has demonstrated a 40% reduction in inflammatory markers." Kent immediately responds: "Your 2023 paper (Chen et al., J. Immunology) reported 37% reduction, not 40%. The 40% figure appears in Rivera et al., 2022, which used a different assay. Recommend citing both or correcting the figure." That correction just saved your proposal from a reviewer's red pen.
Automation
Peer review comments arrive: Reviewer 2 has 14 detailed requests ranging from "justify your sample size" to "address the limitation of self-reported data" to "compare your findings with Zhang et al. 2021." Manually addressing each one means re-reading your own paper, hunting for supporting data, and crafting careful responses. Drop the review into Kent. Ghost Mode processes each comment overnight, mapping it to relevant sections of your manuscript, identifying supporting data from your workspace, and drafting point-by-point responses with citations. You wake up to a structured response document.
Ghost Mode rule: "For each reviewer comment, identify the relevant section of my manuscript, find supporting evidence from my workspace, and draft a response that either addresses the concern with data or explains why the current approach is justified." By morning, 14 reviewer comments have 14 drafted responses, 11 with supporting citations from your own data. You spend 2 hours refining instead of 2 days drafting.
Data
Your lab's PostgreSQL database has 50,000 participant records across 8 tables with 147 columns. Getting a simple answer like "average BMI of female participants over 40 who completed all 3 follow-ups" requires joining 3 tables and writing 15 lines of SQL. Your collaborator who asked the question does not know SQL. Connect Kent to your database via Connectors. Now anyone on the team can ask questions in plain English. Kent writes the query, runs it, and returns the answer with the SQL visible for verification. Your data becomes accessible to every co-author, not just the one person who knows the schema.
Your PI asks: "How many participants in the treatment group dropped out before week 8, and what were their baseline anxiety scores compared to completers?" You type exactly that into Kent. Kent generates the SQL, joins the enrollment, visits, and baseline_measures tables, and returns: "23 dropouts (14.2%), baseline GAD-7 mean 16.3 vs. 12.1 for completers (p < 0.001). Higher baseline anxiety significantly predicted attrition." Your PI gets the answer in 30 seconds.
Organization
You are running a 3-year longitudinal study, a pilot study for a new grant, writing an R01 proposal, revising a rejected R21, and assembling your tenure dossier. Each project has different sources, different collaborators, different timelines. In Kent, each lives in its own workspace with its own knowledge graph. When you search "sample size justification" in your R01 workspace, Kent pulls your power analysis and precedent papers. The same search in your tenure workspace pulls your publication metrics. Switch between projects in one click. Nothing bleeds. Everything is findable.
It is grant season. You switch to your "R01 Renewal" workspace and ask "What were our primary findings from Years 1-3?" Kent synthesizes across 14 published papers and 3 annual reports you dropped in. Then you switch to "New R21" and the context shifts completely. Both workspaces draw from your publication archive, but each maintains its own narrative and organizational logic.
Join the wait list. Be first to know when Kent launches.
Start Researching with Kent