Kent gives you cross-department visibility, instant document synthesis, and total confidentiality for your most sensitive work. Your time is worth $500-2,000/hr. Stop spending it searching for information.
Board Prep
Board meeting is Thursday. You need a deck that synthesizes financials, product metrics, hiring pipeline, and competitive landscape. The data lives in 11 different documents across 4 departments. With Google Drive and Slack connected, Kent continuously ingests the latest department reports and executive channel discussions -- no one has to "send you the numbers." Kent already has them all. It builds the narrative arc, identifies the three things the board will actually ask about, and drafts the answers.
Drop the Q4 P&L, product dashboard screenshot, hiring tracker, and competitive brief into Kent (some were dropped weeks ago and Kent already remembers them). Ask: "Build a board deck outline for Thursday. Highlight the biggest risk and the biggest opportunity." Kent produces 10 slide outlines: Slide 3 flags that CAC increased 34% while LTV held flat, predicts the board will ask about payback period, and drafts your answer with the specific channel mix changes planned for Q1. Slide 7 identifies that your competitor's enterprise churn rate (mentioned in the analyst report you dropped last month) is 2.3x yours, a positioning advantage nobody on your team has articulated yet. Total prep time: 3 hours instead of your usual 12.
Meetings
You run a 90-minute leadership meeting every Monday. Half the time is spent on verbal status updates that people could have read. Kent captures the discussion, extracts the decisions and action items, assigns owners, and creates commitments with due dates. Next Monday, it opens with "Here are the 4 overdue items from last week" before anyone sits down.
Voice-to-Brain during your Monday leadership meeting. Kent transcribes 87 minutes of discussion across 8 participants. Output: 6 decisions made (including "pause hiring for the Austin office until Q2 pipeline is confirmed"), 14 action items with owners and due dates ("Sarah: finalize vendor shortlist by March 14"), and 3 items explicitly tabled for next week. Kent creates commitments for each action item. The following Monday, before the meeting starts, Kent surfaces: 11 of 14 items completed, 2 in progress, 1 overdue (the vendor shortlist, which Kent flags at 9 AM on March 15). Your meetings now start with accountability, not "so where were we?"
Due Diligence
The acquisition target sent a data room with 847 files. Your deal team has two weeks to evaluate. Kent ingests the entire data room, memorizes every entity, every contract clause, every financial figure. Your team asks questions in natural language instead of hunting through folders. Kent finds the contradictions they would have missed.
Drop the entire data room into Kent (847 files: contracts, financials, org charts, IP filings, customer lists). Ask: "What are the top 5 risks in this acquisition?" Kent identifies: (1) 3 customer contracts representing 41% of ARR have 90-day termination clauses triggered by change of control, (2) two pending patent disputes not mentioned in the seller's risk disclosures but found in legal correspondence, (3) the CTO and VP Engineering both have vesting cliffs in 4 months with no retention agreements, (4) revenue recognition on 2 enterprise deals does not match GAAP standards based on contract terms, (5) a $2.1M liability in the vendor contracts folder that is not reflected in the balance sheet. Your outside counsel confirms all 5 findings. Kent just saved you from a $2.1M balance sheet surprise and a 41% revenue concentration risk that would have taken 3 analysts two weeks to find manually.
Crisis
A data breach, a PR incident, a surprise regulatory action. You have hours, not days. Kent has your crisis playbook, your previous communications, your stakeholder list, and your legal guidelines already in Memory. Ghost Mode detects the alert and starts drafting before you finish reading the notification.
Ghost Mode rule: "When I receive a document containing 'security incident' or 'data breach', immediately draft responses for: (1) board notification, (2) customer communication, (3) employee memo, (4) press statement." Your CISO drops an incident report at 6:47 AM. By 6:48 AM, Kent has drafted all four documents, each using the appropriate legal language from your previous breach notification (dropped 18 months ago), referencing your cyber insurance policy terms, and following the communication timeline required by your state's breach notification law (72 hours). Your GC reviews and approves with minor edits by 8:15 AM. The press statement goes out before the first journalist inquiry arrives at 9:30 AM. You controlled the narrative instead of reacting to it.
Strategy
Every quarter, you try to understand how product, engineering, sales, and finance are actually performing against the plan. That requires extracting information from people who are too busy to write reports. Connect Salesforce for pipeline data, Jira for engineering velocity, and your finance database via PostgreSQL. Kent has each department's workspace enriched with live connector data alongside the documents and meeting notes. Ask cross-functional questions and get answers with sources.
Each department has a Kent Workspace. You ask: "Compare engineering velocity this quarter versus plan, and correlate with sales pipeline changes." Kent pulls from Engineering workspace: 142 story points delivered versus 160 planned (89%), with the gap concentrated in the payments team (2 engineers out for 3 weeks). From Sales workspace: pipeline grew 28% but enterprise deals are taking 11 days longer to close. Discovery surfaces a connection: 4 enterprise prospects specifically cited the missing payments feature (PROJ-291) as a blocker in their evaluation notes. Kent recommends: "Backfill the payments team with a contractor for 4 weeks to unblock PROJ-291. Potential pipeline impact: $340K in enterprise deals currently stalled." You make one decision based on evidence from three departments without a single status meeting.
Confidential
You are reviewing term sheets, board resolutions, and compensation benchmarks. This data cannot touch a cloud API under any circumstances. Kent in Privacy Mode runs entirely on your machine. Full AI analysis of the most sensitive documents your company produces, with a cryptographic guarantee that zero bytes left the network.
Toggle Privacy Mode. Drop the term sheet for a $45M Series C, the cap table, and three comparable deal summaries. Kent (running on your local Ollama instance) analyzes: the liquidation preference stack means common shareholders receive nothing below a $120M exit, the anti-dilution clause is full-ratchet rather than weighted-average which is unfavorable, and the board seat provision gives the new investor veto power on M&A. Kent compares against your three comps and highlights: "2 of 3 comparable deals used weighted-average anti-dilution. Full-ratchet at this stage is aggressive. Estimated dilution impact in a down-round scenario: 8.3% additional dilution to existing shareholders." You walk into the negotiation with specific counter-arguments. Kent's audit log confirms zero outbound network requests during the entire session.
Join the wait list. Be first to know when Kent launches.
Get Started Free