Missing a deadline is malpractice. Missing a connection in discovery loses the case. Kent reads everything, remembers everything, and surfaces what matters before it is too late.
Memory
You just received 14 boxes of document production in the Hartfield v. Crestview breach-of-contract case. Your paralegal estimates 60 hours to review and index them. You drop the entire batch into Kent. Within minutes, Kent extracts every person mentioned, every date, every dollar amount, and every contractual reference. You type: "Show me every communication where delivery timelines were discussed and the date differs from the MSA." Kent returns 23 documents with the specific paragraphs highlighted.
Drop 412 pages of discovery documents. Ask Kent: "Find every instance where Crestview acknowledged the March 15 delivery deadline." Kent returns 7 emails and 2 meeting minutes where Crestview references March 15, plus flags 3 internal Crestview emails where they discuss that the deadline is "unrealistic" but never communicated this to your client. Your paralegal would have found the 7 obvious ones. Kent found the 3 that win the case.
Discovery
Three weeks ago you ingested the engagement letter for a new client, Apex Logistics. Today you drop a contract from an existing matter, and Kent surfaces a connection: the opposing party (Trident Shipping) shares a board member with Apex Logistics, a fact buried in an annual report you dropped into Kent months ago. With Gmail connected, Kent also caught that your partner exchanged 3 emails with Trident's counsel last year on an unrelated matter -- another relationship thread your conflict system would never flag. Your firm conflict system checks party names. Kent checks relationships. That one alert prevents a potential disqualification motion and a Bar complaint.
Morning notification: "Potential conflict detected. James Whitfield is listed as a board member of both Apex Logistics (your client, Matter 2024-1847) and Trident Shipping (opposing party in Chen v. Trident, Matter 2024-0923). Source: Apex Logistics 2024 Annual Report, page 34, dropped October 3. Trident Shipping LLC formation documents, page 2, dropped January 12." No one asked Kent to run a conflict check. It connected the dots across months of ingested documents.
Ghost Mode
You set a Ghost Mode rule: "When a filing deadline is within 14 days, draft the filing checklist and send me a summary of what is complete and what is outstanding." Kent checks your workspace, your Google Drive folder for signed documents, and your Outlook calendar for scheduled dates. On Tuesday morning, you find a pre-built alert: the statute of limitations on the Mercado wrongful termination claim expires in 11 days, the complaint is drafted but unsigned, the filing fee has not been paid, and the process server has not been retained. At $400/hr, missing this deadline would be malpractice. Kent just saved your license.
Ghost Mode alert at 7 AM: "Mercado v. DataStream - SOL expires February 28 (11 days). Status: Complaint draft v3 in workspace (last edited Jan 29). OUTSTANDING: (1) Client signature on verification, (2) $435 filing fee not yet processed, (3) Process server not retained for service on DataStream registered agent at 445 Park Ave, NY. Recommended: Schedule client signing by Feb 21 to allow 5 business days for service." You act on a checklist instead of scrambling to remember.
Voice
You just spent 4 hours deposing the CFO in a securities fraud case. Walking to your car, you dictate: "CFO contradicted his declaration on three points. First, he said he learned about the restatement on June 3rd, but Exhibit 14 shows an email thread from May 28th. Second, he claimed the board was informed immediately but could not name which board members were told. Third, he said the outside auditor approved the methodology, but when I showed him the auditor letter, he admitted he had not read it." Kent transcribes, creates a contradiction matrix, links each point to specific exhibits, and drafts the deposition summary memo.
Two-minute voice note becomes a structured deposition summary: "CONTRADICTIONS IDENTIFIED - (1) Timeline: CFO states learned of restatement June 3. Exhibit 14 (email chain) shows discussion May 28, 6 days earlier. (2) Board notification: CFO unable to identify specific board members informed. Cross-reference with board minutes from June meeting needed. (3) Auditor reliance: CFO claims auditor approval but admitted on record he did not read the auditor methodology letter (Exhibit 22)." Linked to case workspace with exhibit references.
Visual
During a hearing, opposing counsel puts up a timeline exhibit showing their version of events. You screenshot it from the courtroom screen. Kent OCRs the timeline, compares every date against the documents in your case workspace, and within seconds identifies 4 dates that conflict with the documentary evidence you already have. You stand up for cross-examination with a ready-made list of contradictions and the specific exhibits that prove each one.
Screenshot the opposing timeline exhibit. Kent responds: "4 discrepancies found. (1) Exhibit shows contract signed March 1 - your workspace has the executed copy dated March 14. (2) Exhibit shows notice sent April 20 - USPS tracking in your file shows mailed April 29. (3) Exhibit omits the May 7 cure letter entirely. (4) Exhibit shows termination August 1 - termination letter in your file dated August 15." Each discrepancy linked to the source document in your workspace. Preparation time: 15 seconds.
Workspaces
Your firm handles both the landlord and a tenant in different matters (cleared by conflicts). In Privacy Mode, each matter runs in a completely isolated workspace with zero data crossover. Kent processes everything locally via Ollama. No cloud. No commingling. No associate accidentally pulling up the wrong file. When the landlord matter asks Kent about lease terms, it has no knowledge that the tenant matter even exists. True information isolation, not just folder permissions.
Matter A (Landlord - Apex Properties): Kent knows the building financials, maintenance records, and lease portfolio. Matter B (Tenant - Rivera LLC): Kent knows the lease dispute history, code violations, and correspondence. Ask Kent in Matter A about Rivera LLC and it responds: "No information found." The workspaces are cryptographically separate. Combined with Privacy Mode, zero bytes leave your machine. Your ethics obligations are enforced by architecture, not just policy.
Join the wait list. Be first to know when Kent launches.
Start Your Free Trial